In less than a week there has been a rise in cases of murder suicide. Nationwide there's reports of murder suicides, where the people had either made an attempt to kill their family then themselves, or successfully committed the act.
What drives a person to want to kill themselves and their family?
Is it the stress from the plummeted economy?
Whatever the case may be, in the pass four-days this has been the case. In Michigan alone there's been three cases involving people that killed their family and then themselves. The most recent killing involved a South Lyon mother who gave her 13- year-old daughter prescription drugs, killing the child and then the mother tried to kill herself. The mother survived and is in critical condition at a local hospital.
Questions surfaced whether the mother was stressed about caring for the girl because the teenager suffered from mental disabilities and health problems. Police say on two recent occasions the teen became violent, by assaulted her mother.
Michigan
In another Michigan story, a mother shot her 14 year-old daughter in the back, then turned the gun on herself. In this case the mother didn't survive, but the child did.
Texas
In Texas, a mayor of a Dallas suburb killed her teen daughter before turning the gun on herself, according to the county medical examiner. Police found the bodies of Jayne Peters, 55, and her 19-year-old daughter Corrine at their home after being sent to investigate the Coppell mayor's absence from a council meeting. Police found notes throughout the house, none of the notes explained what led to the shootings – only instructions about the care of the family pets. Two dogs were also found in the house.
California
In California, a horrific scene was discovered when a co-worker of a man went to his house only to find that the man had shot his wife and 3 year-old son. The child hid himself inside a trash dumpster for 12 hours until police discovered him there. The police found the boy bleeding from 3 gunshot wounds to his shoulder, stomach and chest. His parents were found dead on lawn chairs outside the Anaheim home, and his uninjured 5-year-old brother was hiding elsewhere in the house. The older boy told police he could hear his baby brother "screaming and hollering," but didn't know where he was.
A friend said the family had financial problems. Police are continuing to investigate. "It's very difficult to determine a motive for killing your own kids," the police spokesman said. In another case, a 58-year-old woman and 81-year-old man were found dead in a San Rafael hotel Saturday afternoon in an apparent murder-suicide.
Chicago
A man identified as Eugene Robertson, 27, walked into a Old Navy store and shot and killed, Tranesha Palms in her 20s. According to reports from the Chicago Tribune, the couple lived together in an apartment in the 10200 block of South Walden Parkway in the Beverly neighborhood on the South Side.
A police said that the two arrived at the store at the same time, the gunman followed his girlfriend through a State Street door that led to the restricted area for employees. Once inside, the shooting happened quickly, with no signs of a prolonged fight or struggle.
Connecticut
A man and a women were shot to death in a car late Sunday morning in what police believe is a murder-suicide. The shooting happened in the Rite Aid parking lot on Hazard Avenue. When police arrived they found the two slumped over in the car, both people suffering from bullet wounds.The pair was rushed to Baystate Medical Center in Springfield by ambulance, and later died. The couple drove in separate cars and met in the parking lot. Police are still investigating to find out what led to the killing.
Georgia
Matthew Justice, 37, his wife Amy, 36, two children ages 14 and 11 years-old were discovered shot. The man apparently shot his family and turned the gun on himself. The 14-year-old male was transported to Southeast Alabama Medical Center in Dothan where he remains in critical condition, the 11 year-old female who was also taken to the same medical center, got treated and released.
A shooting in Augusta, Georgia left one dead and one injured.
Showing posts with label death scene cleanup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label death scene cleanup. Show all posts
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Determine the Quickest, Most Effective, and Least Costly Way to Clean Up
If you have had a suicide, homicide, or death of any sort in which blood or bodily fluids are lost you are now in need a biohazard clean up company. Another term used to describe a biohazard cleaner is described by many to be crime scene clean up or biorecovery technician. This type of service is not commonly used but is very necessary. The harmful elements of a death scene or trauma scene are typically traumatic and gruesome in nature but in addition to this element their is an issue of health problems that can come from some of the toxins released in the scene. These toxins may be blood borne pathogens, other viruses and disease, many unknowns, as well as odor releasing elements that can cause a home to be almost uninhabitable. In addition to this whatever has been cleaned or removed by the biohazard clean up crew must then be disposed of in a safe and lawful manner, meeting any EPA and other federal and state regulations.
Our crime scene clean up experts are fully licensed in each state and meet all legal requirements, but in addition to this they are highly trained and qualified and have hundred of clean up hours under their belt. A death clean up crew will arrive at your home within an hour of your call if you request. They will begin a remediation inspections and then determine the quickest, most effective, and least costly way to clean up the home and remove any of the remains from the dead body as well as remove the odor. Our biorecovery clean up company will also assist in any billing questions and assist with proper insurance claim filing where appropriate.
The end result is your home getting back to a safe condition, our biorecovery clean up crews always use care and are discreet. Unlike most dead body clean up services, that can take days to complete jobs because they are one man outfits or have to drive from many states over, our crime scene clean up crew will be able to bring as many people as the call requires to get the property cleaned and remove any blood, bodily fluids, brain fragments and more.Contact our 24hrs dispatch center at 877-246-2532
Our crime scene clean up experts are fully licensed in each state and meet all legal requirements, but in addition to this they are highly trained and qualified and have hundred of clean up hours under their belt. A death clean up crew will arrive at your home within an hour of your call if you request. They will begin a remediation inspections and then determine the quickest, most effective, and least costly way to clean up the home and remove any of the remains from the dead body as well as remove the odor. Our biorecovery clean up company will also assist in any billing questions and assist with proper insurance claim filing where appropriate.
The end result is your home getting back to a safe condition, our biorecovery clean up crews always use care and are discreet. Unlike most dead body clean up services, that can take days to complete jobs because they are one man outfits or have to drive from many states over, our crime scene clean up crew will be able to bring as many people as the call requires to get the property cleaned and remove any blood, bodily fluids, brain fragments and more.Contact our 24hrs dispatch center at 877-246-2532
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Hiring A Pro For A Crime/Biohazard Cleanup
Unbeknownst to most, crime scenes, biohazard scenes or death scene in general should not be cleaned by property owners/management companies where crime or death scenes have occured. In addition, police and municipal workers do not clean crime/death scenes in the private sector.
The term crime scene technically refers to any area where a crime has taken place. Having a crime committed on your property can be traumatic and psychologically damaging. If this occurs in a property you own or rent, you may be surprised to know that the onus of cleanup belongs to you. Cleaning up after a crime yourself can make the trauma much worse, as well as physically dangerous to future residents of the home. In order to be assured a safe, clean property going forward, it is always recommended to leave the cleanup to the pros.
A lot of people don't really understand what constitutes a crime scene until they themselves step into one. Whenever such an event occurs, the police, ambulance services or fire departments are called first. Emergency services do the most important work in these situations, but one aspect of the job they do not handle: the cleanup. So crime scene cleanup professionals are the second call you should always make after a crime has taken place.
Psychological Trauma
It's true that the owner of a residence is actually responsible for its cleanup. Still, no one should ever be forced to do so. The trauma of performing such a cleanup can be devastating, and the impact of engaging in such an act can scar a person for life. The best crime scene cleanup crews are given special sensitivity training, so they can tactfully interact with a bereaved family while not falling apart at the same time.
Biohazard Dangers
Federal regulations assert that all body fluids are considered biohazards. As such, only a person trained in removing biohazard materials should clean a crime scene contaminated by bodily matter. This isn't merely an overly cautious suggestion; blood and tissue are truly dangerous substances that can easily lead to infection. Often, a small splatter or stain on a wall or floor only indicates that what lies beneath is a much larger pool of human detritus. Only someone equipped with the tools (such as biohazard suits, nonporous gloves, and breathing apparatus) and training should attempt to clean up this kind of mess. Sometimes, a crime scene that even appears relatively clean can hide an invisible mess of bacteria and other dangerous pathogens. Only someone with the proper apparatus to completely disinfect the domicile should be called in to clean it up.
Disposing of Waste
Anyone transporting biohazard or human remains requires special permits and equipment to do so. In addition to transporting issues, crime scene cleaners have to pay a medical disposal company to dispose of human waste by burning it in a special incinerator. The medical waste companies generally charge by the pound and will only burn a minimum amount of waste. Therefore, crime scene cleanup companies will often store biohazard waste until they have enough to dispose of. Here in NY City it is illedale to dispose and any material that contains blood or body fluids into the City Sanitation stream. Mattresses, chairs, linens, ect. can only be disposed by a company that has a permit to dispose of these items as regulated waste or red bag waste. Any management company that has there employee perform this work without the proper training, medical followup and disposal is at risk of receiving fines from OSHA, DEC, and Sanitation.
There are many good reasons not to attempt a crime scene cleanup on your own. Crime scene cleanup organizations regulate and set certain standards for the industry. So, if a crime has been committed on your property, the best thing you can do is to contact these institutions for a recommendation.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Spike in killings and shootings around the city has New Yorkers worried
BY Jonathan Lemire
DAILY NEWS POLICE BUREAU
Murders are up sharply in the city this year, with startling increases in gunplay across the five boroughs, a Daily News study of NYPD statistics shows.
The citywide murder rate has increased 22.8% in the first 11 weeks of the year over the same period in 2009, from 79 homicides to 97 as of Sunday, the most recent day for which statistics are available.
Shootings in general are also up citywide, with 293 people hit by bullets this year, a 16.3% change from the total of 252 recorded by March 21 last year.
Coming after a year in which New York saw the fewest number of homicides on record, the spike in crime rattled residents trying to go about their lives.
"There's always new problems," said Shirley Mercedes, 15, who lives in the South Bronx's gang-riddled 40th precinct, where the crime rise has been steepest.
Seventeen people have been shot in the precinct this year, compared with five over the same period last year.
"[It] is getting worse," Shirley said. "I shouldn't be used to it, but it's where I live."
There were 466 slayings in New York in 2009, the lowest year-end total since the NYPD started its tracking method in 1963.
"The NYPD is fighting its own success," said Paul Browne, the Police Department's top spokesman.
Browne pointed out that this year's murder rate is still 14% lower than 2008 and 39% lower than the murder rate in 2001.
The dramatic 2009 drop came despite harder economic times and a smaller police force stretched thin by counter-terrorism operations.
That big success is losing some ground, the statistics show.
Murders in Manhattan have risen from 9 to 16, a 77.8% increase, and they are up 28.6% in Queens, from 14 to 18.
Brooklyn and the Bronx have also suffered an increase in the murder rate - both at about 15%. Only Staten Island has seen another decrease in the homicide rate.
The overall city crime rate, comprised of seven major felonies, dropped 2% in the first three months of the year. And even among the increases, the raw numbers are still very low.
Some neighborhoods feel under siege.
"It's like war [and] it's getting worse every day," said Joel Araujo, 19, who works at a clothing store in Port Morris, Bronx.
In tree-lined Queens Village, murders have gone from 1 to 5 through Sunday - and the medical examiner confirmed a sixth yesterday - while shootings in the neighborhood have increased from 2 to 9, a 450% jump.
The 88th Precinct in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, has already had six shootings this year, after having none in the first months of 2009.
Police officials have long credited the dramatic recent drop in crime to Operation Impact, which floods felony-prone areas with uniformed rookies.
Proposed budget cuts could further imperil its effectiveness by reducing NYPD manpower, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly has warned.
Browne partially attributed the increase in murders to a rise in arson deaths, from zero to six, and in homicides among family members, from 12 to 14.
DAILY NEWS POLICE BUREAU
Murders are up sharply in the city this year, with startling increases in gunplay across the five boroughs, a Daily News study of NYPD statistics shows.
The citywide murder rate has increased 22.8% in the first 11 weeks of the year over the same period in 2009, from 79 homicides to 97 as of Sunday, the most recent day for which statistics are available.
Shootings in general are also up citywide, with 293 people hit by bullets this year, a 16.3% change from the total of 252 recorded by March 21 last year.
Coming after a year in which New York saw the fewest number of homicides on record, the spike in crime rattled residents trying to go about their lives.
"There's always new problems," said Shirley Mercedes, 15, who lives in the South Bronx's gang-riddled 40th precinct, where the crime rise has been steepest.
Seventeen people have been shot in the precinct this year, compared with five over the same period last year.
"[It] is getting worse," Shirley said. "I shouldn't be used to it, but it's where I live."
There were 466 slayings in New York in 2009, the lowest year-end total since the NYPD started its tracking method in 1963.
"The NYPD is fighting its own success," said Paul Browne, the Police Department's top spokesman.
Browne pointed out that this year's murder rate is still 14% lower than 2008 and 39% lower than the murder rate in 2001.
The dramatic 2009 drop came despite harder economic times and a smaller police force stretched thin by counter-terrorism operations.
That big success is losing some ground, the statistics show.
Murders in Manhattan have risen from 9 to 16, a 77.8% increase, and they are up 28.6% in Queens, from 14 to 18.
Brooklyn and the Bronx have also suffered an increase in the murder rate - both at about 15%. Only Staten Island has seen another decrease in the homicide rate.
The overall city crime rate, comprised of seven major felonies, dropped 2% in the first three months of the year. And even among the increases, the raw numbers are still very low.
Some neighborhoods feel under siege.
"It's like war [and] it's getting worse every day," said Joel Araujo, 19, who works at a clothing store in Port Morris, Bronx.
In tree-lined Queens Village, murders have gone from 1 to 5 through Sunday - and the medical examiner confirmed a sixth yesterday - while shootings in the neighborhood have increased from 2 to 9, a 450% jump.
The 88th Precinct in Fort Greene, Brooklyn, has already had six shootings this year, after having none in the first months of 2009.
Police officials have long credited the dramatic recent drop in crime to Operation Impact, which floods felony-prone areas with uniformed rookies.
Proposed budget cuts could further imperil its effectiveness by reducing NYPD manpower, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly has warned.
Browne partially attributed the increase in murders to a rise in arson deaths, from zero to six, and in homicides among family members, from 12 to 14.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Qns. murder-scene lawsuit is a bloody mess
By KATHIANNE BONIELLO
It's bad enough when a man is murdered in your backyard. It's worse when the city leaves you to mop up the mess.
That's the lament of three Queens women suing the city for failing to clean up a crime scene or keeping a promise to advise them on how to safely scrub their driveways and walkways of bodily fluids.
Grace Scott, 56, was sitting in her St. Albans home with a friend when the shots rang out on Nov. 28, 2008.
Police told Scott and her family to stay inside as they investigated the murder of Sheldon Francis, 31.
Authorities at the time said they would go back to talk to the homeowners about the cleanup. No one ever did.
"I don't know how to clean up blood," said Scott, who shudders at the memory of being unable to remove the stains. "It was embedded."
Scott tried peroxiding and bleaching before finally paying $4,000 to replace the concrete.
The NYPD, which is being sued for $120,000, said it does not clean up crime scenes.
It's bad enough when a man is murdered in your backyard. It's worse when the city leaves you to mop up the mess.
That's the lament of three Queens women suing the city for failing to clean up a crime scene or keeping a promise to advise them on how to safely scrub their driveways and walkways of bodily fluids.
Grace Scott, 56, was sitting in her St. Albans home with a friend when the shots rang out on Nov. 28, 2008.
Police told Scott and her family to stay inside as they investigated the murder of Sheldon Francis, 31.
Authorities at the time said they would go back to talk to the homeowners about the cleanup. No one ever did.
"I don't know how to clean up blood," said Scott, who shudders at the memory of being unable to remove the stains. "It was embedded."
Scott tried peroxiding and bleaching before finally paying $4,000 to replace the concrete.
The NYPD, which is being sued for $120,000, said it does not clean up crime scenes.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Someone's got to do it
By Zohra Mohamed
It's rated online as the most mentally disturbing and among the 10 worst jobs in the world. But that did not deter former graphic designer Warren Roberts from giving up his IT job to become a crime scene cleaner.
The 26-year-old credits his bizarre choice to years of fascination with crime scenes, and decided to take the plunge after contacting a company in New York. Following intense correspondence and training, he started his own company in Johannesburg last year, Alpha Crime Scene Cleaning, which operates 24 hours a day.
Complete with the masks, chemicals and comprehensive safety gear such as gloves and overalls, Roberts spent months on his own, mopping up crime scenes before expanding to include three full-time "technicians".
Warren Roberts and employee Penny Rostron
With SA crime rates among the highest in the world, Roberts explains that it is a lucrative, if gruesome job, and not a career of choice for the average Joe. "The technicians must be psychologically prepared to brave blood, decomposition and the loose remains of human bodies once the police have left the scene. They all have to undergo regular psychological evaluation and ongoing training - even if they have come from a military or police background."
Roberts says it is the law in most countries to have a crime scene professionally cleaned because of health risks, but there is no law in SA as to who is responsible for cleaning a scene. "There's a great difference between a scene looking clean and being truly clean. Our clients can rest assured the unseen risks have been taken care of."
His company is often called out by emergency or police services and referred to the people concerned, who are liable for the cleaning costs. These range from R900 to R1 600/ hour, depending on the crime and the nature of clean-up. Roberts is usually called out about 12 times a month, but says the recession has resulted in an increase in the demand for his services, partly as a result of increased suicides.
Despite the shocking nature of the job and the risks of contracting deadly viruses during the cleaning up of a crime scene, there is competition. However, most other companies operate with only an individual, while his company is manned by three experienced technicians.
"We are constantly updated with the risks of BPB (blood-borne pathogens) and HIV and have a good understanding of the risks as well as the precautions we have to take to avoid contamination. The police are not responsible for the cleaning and we always have access to a counsellor for staff and the families we deal with to help them cope with the situation."
He admits that despite all the training, the emotional impact is a constant challenge that is difficult to come to terms with.
"It can become very depressing and for this reason we have a close support network within the company as well as regular sessions with a psychologist. If there are the slightest signs that someone is becoming too emotionally affected they are taken off, given a break and receive support from everyone in the team."
On a lighter note, I ask Roberts if he is single because women are put off by his profession and fear he knows exactly how to get rid of them if things go wrong. He laughs and replies: "I'd like to believe it's more my 24 hours on call that is a factor."
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Appeals panel agrees that failure to read document doesn't null contract
KEITH ARNOLD, Daily Reporter Staff Writer
A Franklin County appellate panel was unable to conclude that the Franklin County Municipal Court's determination in a breach of contract suit between a specialty home-cleaning service and the next of kin of a Grove City man who died in his home was against the manifest weight of the evidence in a recent decision.
"Upon our review of the record, we find no error in the trial court's determination that an enforceable contract existed between the parties," 10th District Court of Appeals Judge Patrick McGrath wrote for the 3-0 court.
The appellate court's holding overruled Nancy Buffington's claim that the trial court was mistaken to find that the contract between her and the cleaning service was enforceable and, therefore, obligated the woman to utilize the company's services per the agreed terms.
Buffington's father died in his home on Nov. 10, 2005, case summary provided. The man's body was discovered one-and-a-half to two days after his death. Approximately one week later, the personal belongings were removed from the home and it was listed for sale.
On Jan. 14, 2006, Buffington contracted for the services of Aftermath Inc., which provides biological remediation and cleanup services. According to the contract, the woman agreed to pay for cleanup services concerning an unattended death in the Grove City home.
Aftermath's complaint alleged that after the firm rendered services, appellant refused to pay the amount due under the contract. After a trial to the bench, the trial court concluded that a valid written contract existed between the parties and that the company was entitled to payment for the services rendered in accordance with the contract. The court awarded damages in the amount of $6,189.36 to Aftermath.
The panel noted Buffington signed both a site cleanup agreement and a fee agreement for non-insurance-related jobs. Additionally, the court rejected the woman's claim there existed no evidence that she understood or agreed to biological remediation of her father's home.
"... As noted by the trial court, appellant's stated failure to read the documents prior to signing them is of no consequence as it is well-established that the failure to read the terms of a contract is not a valid defense to enforcement of the contract," as in Haller v. Borror Corp. (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 10, 14.
"Further, appellant's argument that she was 'mistaken' equally fails because 'relief for a unilateral mistake of material fact will not be provided where such mistake is the result of the negligence of the party seeking relief,'" as in Hikmet v. Turkoglu, 10th Dist. No. 08AP-1021, 2009-Ohio-6477, and Marshall v. Beach (2001), 143 Ohio App.3d 432, 437.
Fellow 10th District Judge Susan Brown and John Connor joined McGrath to form the majority.
The case is cited as Aftermath Inc. v. Buffington, 2010-Ohio-19.
Date Published: January 19, 2010
A Franklin County appellate panel was unable to conclude that the Franklin County Municipal Court's determination in a breach of contract suit between a specialty home-cleaning service and the next of kin of a Grove City man who died in his home was against the manifest weight of the evidence in a recent decision.
"Upon our review of the record, we find no error in the trial court's determination that an enforceable contract existed between the parties," 10th District Court of Appeals Judge Patrick McGrath wrote for the 3-0 court.
The appellate court's holding overruled Nancy Buffington's claim that the trial court was mistaken to find that the contract between her and the cleaning service was enforceable and, therefore, obligated the woman to utilize the company's services per the agreed terms.
Buffington's father died in his home on Nov. 10, 2005, case summary provided. The man's body was discovered one-and-a-half to two days after his death. Approximately one week later, the personal belongings were removed from the home and it was listed for sale.
On Jan. 14, 2006, Buffington contracted for the services of Aftermath Inc., which provides biological remediation and cleanup services. According to the contract, the woman agreed to pay for cleanup services concerning an unattended death in the Grove City home.
Aftermath's complaint alleged that after the firm rendered services, appellant refused to pay the amount due under the contract. After a trial to the bench, the trial court concluded that a valid written contract existed between the parties and that the company was entitled to payment for the services rendered in accordance with the contract. The court awarded damages in the amount of $6,189.36 to Aftermath.
The panel noted Buffington signed both a site cleanup agreement and a fee agreement for non-insurance-related jobs. Additionally, the court rejected the woman's claim there existed no evidence that she understood or agreed to biological remediation of her father's home.
"... As noted by the trial court, appellant's stated failure to read the documents prior to signing them is of no consequence as it is well-established that the failure to read the terms of a contract is not a valid defense to enforcement of the contract," as in Haller v. Borror Corp. (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 10, 14.
"Further, appellant's argument that she was 'mistaken' equally fails because 'relief for a unilateral mistake of material fact will not be provided where such mistake is the result of the negligence of the party seeking relief,'" as in Hikmet v. Turkoglu, 10th Dist. No. 08AP-1021, 2009-Ohio-6477, and Marshall v. Beach (2001), 143 Ohio App.3d 432, 437.
Fellow 10th District Judge Susan Brown and John Connor joined McGrath to form the majority.
The case is cited as Aftermath Inc. v. Buffington, 2010-Ohio-19.
Date Published: January 19, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Teen Suicide Risk Factors: Parents Are Too Often Clueless
By Nancy Shute
Suicide is the third leading cause of death among teenagers, and it's a tragedy that can be prevented. Given that almost 15 percent of high school students say they've seriously considered suicide in the past year, parents and friends need to know how to recognize when a teenager is in trouble and how to help.
Parents can be clueless when it comes to recognizing suicide risk factors, or at least more clueless than teens. In a new survey of teenagers and parents in Chicago and in the Kansas City, Kan., area, which appears online in Pediatrics, both parents and teenagers said that teen suicide was a problem, but not in their community. Alas, teen suicide is a universal problem; no area is immune.
The teenagers correctly said that drug and alcohol use was a big risk factor for suicide, with some even noting that drinking and drug use could be a form of self-medication or self-harm. By contrast, many of the parents shrugged off substance abuse as acceptable adolescent behavior. As one parent told the researchers: "Some parents smoke pot with their kids or allow their kids to drink."
Both teenagers and parents said that guns should be kept away from a suicidal teen. But since parents said they didn't think they could determine when a teenager was suicidal, parents should routinely lock up firearms, the researchers suggest. That makes sense. Firearms are used in 43.1 percent of teen suicides, according to 2006 data, while suffocation or hanging accounts for 44.9 percent.
The good news: Both parents and teenagers in this small survey (66 teenagers and 30 parents) said they'd like more help learning how to know when someone is at risk of committing suicide and what to do. Schools and pediatricians should be able to help, but we can all become better educated through reliable resources on the Web. These authoritative sites list typical signs of suicide risk, and they also provide questions a parent or a friend can ask a teenager to find out if he is considering killing himself. Here are good places to start:
The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry lists signs and symptoms of suicidal thinking, such as saying things like "I won't be a problem for you much longer."
The American Academy of Pediatrics urges parents to ask the child directly about suicide. "Getting the word out in the open may help your teenager think someone has heard his cries for help."
The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline provides free advice to someone considering suicide, as well as to friends and relatives, at 800-273-TALK.
The National Alliance on Mental Illness's teenage suicide page makes the point that talking with someone about suicide will not "give them the idea." "Bringing up the question of suicide and discussing it without showing shock or disapproval is one of the most helpful things you can do," the NAMI site says. "This openness shows that you are taking the individual seriously and responding to the severity of his or her distress."
Suicide is the third leading cause of death among teenagers, and it's a tragedy that can be prevented. Given that almost 15 percent of high school students say they've seriously considered suicide in the past year, parents and friends need to know how to recognize when a teenager is in trouble and how to help.
Parents can be clueless when it comes to recognizing suicide risk factors, or at least more clueless than teens. In a new survey of teenagers and parents in Chicago and in the Kansas City, Kan., area, which appears online in Pediatrics, both parents and teenagers said that teen suicide was a problem, but not in their community. Alas, teen suicide is a universal problem; no area is immune.
The teenagers correctly said that drug and alcohol use was a big risk factor for suicide, with some even noting that drinking and drug use could be a form of self-medication or self-harm. By contrast, many of the parents shrugged off substance abuse as acceptable adolescent behavior. As one parent told the researchers: "Some parents smoke pot with their kids or allow their kids to drink."
Both teenagers and parents said that guns should be kept away from a suicidal teen. But since parents said they didn't think they could determine when a teenager was suicidal, parents should routinely lock up firearms, the researchers suggest. That makes sense. Firearms are used in 43.1 percent of teen suicides, according to 2006 data, while suffocation or hanging accounts for 44.9 percent.
The good news: Both parents and teenagers in this small survey (66 teenagers and 30 parents) said they'd like more help learning how to know when someone is at risk of committing suicide and what to do. Schools and pediatricians should be able to help, but we can all become better educated through reliable resources on the Web. These authoritative sites list typical signs of suicide risk, and they also provide questions a parent or a friend can ask a teenager to find out if he is considering killing himself. Here are good places to start:
The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry lists signs and symptoms of suicidal thinking, such as saying things like "I won't be a problem for you much longer."
The American Academy of Pediatrics urges parents to ask the child directly about suicide. "Getting the word out in the open may help your teenager think someone has heard his cries for help."
The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline provides free advice to someone considering suicide, as well as to friends and relatives, at 800-273-TALK.
The National Alliance on Mental Illness's teenage suicide page makes the point that talking with someone about suicide will not "give them the idea." "Bringing up the question of suicide and discussing it without showing shock or disapproval is one of the most helpful things you can do," the NAMI site says. "This openness shows that you are taking the individual seriously and responding to the severity of his or her distress."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
